Law

1 .There is an offer and an credenza between crest and Fred everywhere the chairs and filing cabinets but thither are a hardly a(prenominal) issues here . The test is one of intent . Fred s acceptance of the chairs came 3 weeks late to be able to obtain the chairs at the hurt previously indicated so in this blame chose non to send the chairs as they would not be under the picky in which two parties spoke of . The test of intent was not completed and was go forth to further negotiations as described in Austrailian br thrust Law (1 ) regarding formations . In not direct the chairs , no fix agreement has been violated . Bill should rich person , in good faith sent him a line of cite /email explaining this as well just to avoid mushiness As for the filing cabinets , because they did not conform to the Austrailian stan dard Fred avocation he rear end send them back requesting the good ones .

If Bill should not agree to this then Fred has recourse in which to puff Bill to be held liable for a break away of the contract 2 .My first question of this scenario is wether or not thither is a written contract between these parties ? If there is not then there is nothing that Lucy can do to look at Dennis pay on the note That diversion , if Dennis is able to stand up , using the Mental Dis and boozing Law (2 ) that he was excite thus showing an imapired check then this contract can become voidable in...If you postulate to get a to the full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay